How Might Probabilistic Reasoning Emerge from the Brain?
نویسندگان
چکیده
A series of hypotheses is proposed, connecting neural structures and dynamics with the formal structures and processes of probabilistic logic. First, a hypothetical connection is proposed between Hebbian learning in the brain and the operation of probabilistic term logic deduction. It is argued that neural assemblies could serve the role of logical terms; synapse-bundles joining neural assemblies could serve the role of first-order term-logic statements; and in this framework, Hebbian learning at the synaptic level would be expected to have the implicit consequence of probabilistic deduction at the logical statement level. A conceptual problem arises with this idea, pertaining to the brain’s lack of a mechanism of “inference trails” as used to avoid circular reasoning in AI term logic inference systems; but it is explained how this problem may be circumvented if one posits an appropriate inference control mechanism. Finally, a brief discussion is given regarding the potential extension of this approach to handle more complex logical expressions involving variables – via the hypothesis of special neural structures mapping neural weights into neural inputs, hence implementing “higher order functions.”
منابع مشابه
A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Coordinating Multi-agent Interactions
We describe a decision-theoretic method that an autonomous agent can use to model multiagent situations and behave rationally based on its model. Our approach, which we call the Recursive Modeling Method, explicitly accounts for the recursive nature of multiagent reasoning. Our method lets an agent recursively model another agent's decisions based on probabilistic views of how that agent percei...
متن کاملPerceptual learning and representational learning in humans and animals.
Traditionally, perceptual learning in humans and classical conditioning in animals have been considered as two very different research areas, with separate problems, paradigms, and explanations. However, a number of themes common to these fields of research emerge when they are approached from the more general concept of representational learning. To demonstrate this, I present results of sever...
متن کاملMaking Decisions with Belief Functions
A primary motivation for reasoning under uncertainty is to derive decisions in the face of inconclusive evi dence. However, Shafer's theory of belief functions, which explicitly represents the underconstrained na ture of many reasoning problems, lacks a formal pro cedure for making decisions. Clearly, when sufficient information is not available, no theory can prescribe actions without makin...
متن کاملRobot control system using SMR signals detection
One of the important issues in designing a brain-computer interface system is to select the type of mental activity to be imagined. In some of these systems, mental activity varies with user intent and action that must be controlled by the brain-computer system, and in a number of other signals, the received signals contain the same activity-related mental activity that should be performed by t...
متن کاملTransforming between Propositions and Features: Bridging the Gap
It is notoriously difficult to simultaneously deal with both probabilistic and structural representations in A.I., particularly because probability necessitates a uniform representation of the training examples. In this paper, we show how to build fully-specified probabilistic models from arbitrary propositional case descriptions about terrorist activities. Our method facilitates both reasoning...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008